AI Term:Cross-Validation

·

·

« Back to Glossary Index

Cross-Validation” is a statistical technique used in machine learning to assess the performance of a model in a more robust and comprehensive manner. It’s particularly useful when the dataset is limited in size, and we want to ensure that our model’s performance is not overly dependent on the way we initially split our data into training and test sets.

Here’s how it typically works:

  1. The dataset is divided into a certain number, k, of equally-sized “folds” or segments. This is where the most commonly used form of cross-validation, k-fold cross-validation, gets its name. For example, if k=5, the dataset would be divided into 5 equal parts.
  2. The model is trained and validated k times. Each time, one of the k folds is held out and used as the validation set, and the remaining k-1 folds are combined and used as the training set.
  3. Each of these k trainings produces a model and a measure of model performance, such as accuracy or mean squared error, based on the held-out validation set.
  4. The k performance measures are then averaged to give a single measure of the model’s performance. This average performance is a more robust estimate of the model’s true performance, because it’s based on multiple different splits of the data.

One variant of k-fold cross-validation is leave-one-out cross-validation, where k equals the number of observations in the dataset. In other words, the model is trained on all data points except one, which is used as the test set. This process is repeated so that each data point serves as the test set once. This can be computationally expensive for large datasets but can provide a very robust estimate of model performance.

Cross-validation helps us ensure that our model’s performance is not overly dependent on the particular way we split our data into training and test sets. It also makes the most of our data, by effectively using different parts of the data as both training and test data. However, it can be more computationally expensive than a single train-test split, because it involves training the model multiple times.

« Back to Glossary Index